A Petition for the Field Museum of National History in Chicago

A Petition for the Field Museum of National History in Chicago

The Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH) in Chicago is a world-class institute that I have had the personal pleasure of enjoying numerous times over the past few years (I am lucky enough to have a partner doing his Ph.D. research in collaboration with the museum). They are facing cuts to their collections and scientific research staff, which has already been pared down greatly. This will undoubtedly affect the quality of outreach, education, and research. Additionally, it will limit the vast potential of the researchers to continue to analyze and study the fantastic collections housed in the museum.

For those of you not familiar with a museum, close to 90% of the actual objects in the museum are NOT displayed. That means behind the beautifully designed, educational exhibits that the public sees when they go in, are millions of fossils, specimens, and artifacts that scientists and research staff study. This knowledge (both realized and potential) is of incalculable wealth, as scientists toil daily behind the scenes – analyzing the bits and pieces of nature that make up the very world we live in. Additionally, visiting scientists come from all the over world visit to study collections, especially at a world class institute like the FMNH.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Please take a moment to look at this petition, and let the current president know whether or not you value the building bricks of science and our natural world. And if you are ever in Chicago, you must stop in – you can see the world’s most complete T-Rex skeleton, watch scientists analyze DNA in their labs in front of your very eyes, wander in the hall of gems, lose yourself in an Egyptian tomb, and so much more!*

And don’t forget to subscribe to my blog (that little box on the right that says ‘Satisfy your Inbox’, for the latest news in science and our natural world.

*My apologies to subscribers that were sent multiple links – the WordPress bots ate my first post for a snack.

In Solidarity with Canadian Nature

Shall I not have intelligence with the earth?  Am I not partly leaves and vegetable mould myself.  ~Henry David Thoreau

In defense of Canada’s environmental legislation.

 

Shall I not have intelligence with the earth?  Am I not partly leaves and vegetable mould myself.  ~Henry David Thoreau

SaveELA.org

A new website dedicated to fighting the closure of Experimental Lakes Area – an internationally renowned facility. Please check it out, see what they have to say, and help take action. ELA has an astounding 50+ year history as an incredible site for ecosystem and large-scale aquatic research, and should not be closed on a whim.

http://saveela.org/

Aerial Image of some of the ELA lakes

Aerial Image of some of the ELA lakes

A Follow Up to an Open Letter

Hello everyone,

I confess I am surprised (but pleased) this many people are interested in this letter. I wrote it in a grumpy state Friday morning after finding out about the closure of ELA (and the demise of many experiments of ex-colleagues). There are several things that have either come up or that I would like to address. Firstly, I am not a professional ‘scientist’ – I have noticed I was called this on Twitter. I worked for Environment Canada in a scientific capacity, but did not have a PhD or do my own research. Other  things:

A) What is your ‘credibility’? There are several people here who want me to publish my personal information, which is just silly. I would never publish my address, employer, phone number, etc. online. However – people calling into question my credibility are misreading the letter. With the exception of the section where I stated that all contact information for the managers of the database I worked with (which I can only provide you the link to the website where I worked, but cannot prove that 3 years ago, contact information was on there – feel free to contact Environment Canada and ask them yourself, they shouldn’t deny it. There are also thousands of individuals across the world who used these databases and can attest to the fact that yes, contact information was previously available), everything else is public information that has been reported in the news, or are initiatives the Conservatives have announced themselves. This is why I included all the links – because that is how science thinking works. I don’t expect you to just believe what I say, so I provide you with the sources to go look for yourself. Some of you have told me that the links are broken, so I am re-posting all the links at the end of this entry.

So, no I am not posting my personal information so you can look me up. That’s creepy and unnecessary. I was never a big-wig, I don’t have any science publications, etc. If someone wants to take me to court, I’ll gladly bring along all my contracts I signed for my positions, proving that I worked there. Otherwise, there’s no need to question my credibility because this is an opinion piece on publicly available information.

As a follow up, I am not currently employed by Environment Canada, and speak only for myself. I lost any potential for continued work with them over 2 years ago, and am over it. What I am not over, is the continued decimation of environmental regulation and protection. And that is the point of this article.

B) What can we do? This is also an excellent question. I have put a few links for petitions on the page already. I am not associated with any of the organizations below, but believe that these are great motions towards halting Bill C-38, and otherwise making our voice heard in the fight to protect our environment. Awareness of issues are the first step. Education is next. Action is the last. This letter was meant to synthesize what is already public information, but was told from my perspective. Some organizations (that I am not associated with, and encourage you to first research) that have petitions against the cutbacks/changes include:

Also: here is a link for all Canadian MP’s. Please note that Keith Ashfield is the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, if you feel strongly about the closure of ELA. www.parl.gc.ca/MembersOfParliament/MainMPsCompleteList.aspx

C) Oil is important, so your argument is pointless. Yes, we all use oil. I’m not saying we shouldn’t have the tar sands – I’d like it if we spent way less money on it, and invested way more money in sustainable energy research and projects, but obviously oil is part of our current society. That’s not my point. The point is that the tar sands are one of the major drivers behind environmental deregulation, and the cuts to funding envionmental research in Canada. The government obviously has money, since we can apparently make room in the budget for billions of dollars worth of fighter jets, but saved a little bit decimating DFO and EC. This means that our environment is being regulated only when it serves a political purpose, and that is absolutely detrimental to the long-term sustainability of both our country and our planet as a viable, living being. We cannot accept environmental policies that are entirely driven by political/corporate/capitalist motives. They must be stand-alone initiatives, that serve to protect the environment for its intrinsic value. Because no matter what TV and your car salesman tells you, nature is the only reason you are alive. You will die without clean water, non-toxic food, and a healthy environment. That’s not a radical idea, that’s a fact. If you can’t see that, than this is just lost on you anyway.

To the majority of you who support the concept – please continue to research, educate, and act. Sign the petitions, go to protests, tell your MP. This is your land as equally as anyone else, and we all deserve a safe, protected nature to enjoy. Do your part otherwise as well – walk, bike, eat local, downsize your ‘needs’, fly less, buy less, share more, turn off the lights. We need to do bottom-up work, as well as fight the top-down effects. We’re in this together. Literally.

Sincerely,

A Canadian that still cares about the environment

**********************************

Links

Here are all the links from my original article – read these, research more, speak up. These are public facts.

Environmentalists are radicals according to the Conservatives: www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/01/09/pol-joe-oliver-radical-groups.html

Scientists are muzzled: www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16861468

Cuts to EC in 2011: www.greenparty.ca/media-release/2011-08-03/deep-cuts-environment-canada

ELA Closure: www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/tories-shut-down-groundbreaking-freshwater-research-station/article2436094/?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=Referrer%3A+Social+Network+%2F+Media&utm_content=2436094&utm_campaign=Shared+Web+Article+Links

Bill C-38/Environmental Destruction Act: http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2012/05/10/Bill-C38/

An Open Letter to the World on the Governmental Destruction of the Environment in Canada

Dear Everyone,

My name is Naomi. I am Canadian. I worked for Environment Canada, our federal environmental department, for several years before our current Conservative leadership (under Stephen Harper) began decimating environmentalism in Canada. I, along with thousands and thousands of federal science employees lost any hope of future work. Their attitude towards the environment is ‘screw research that contradicts the economic growth, particularly of the oil sands’. They have openly and officially denigrated anyone that supports the environment and opposes big-money oil profit as ‘radicals’ (http://tinyurl.com/7wwf8dp).

Every day in Canada, new information about their vendetta on science and the environment becomes quietly public and keeps piling up. I have been privy to much first-hand information still because I retain friendships with my ex-colleagues (though my blood pressure hates me for it).

While I was working there, scientists were effectively muzzled from speaking to the media without prior confirmation with Harper’s media team (http://tinyurl.com/7bnsqp4) – usually denied, and when allowed, totally controlled. Scientists were threatened with job loss if they said anything in an interview that was not exactly what the media team had told them to say. This happened in 2008. The public didn’t find out for years.

During one of my contracts, I was manager of a large, public database set. Contact information for all database managers was available for anyone. I knew what was going on with the information and could answer questions immediately and personally. During this time, I noticed that the media team  started asking me “What would I say” to certain questions. I answered unwittingly. After a certain period of time, I noticed that all contact information had been removed from the internet –eliminating the opportunity for a citizen to inquire directly about these public data sets without contacting the media team. The Conservatives effectively removed another board from the bridge between science and the public, and I had inadvertently helped.

Since then, the Conservative government has been laying off thousands and thousands of full-fledged scientific employees that have been performing research for decades at Environment Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and Parks Canada (e.g. http://tinyurl.com/8xtkaro , http://tinyurl.com/7gvzc7r, http://tinyurl.com/clgn97u ), shutting down entire divisions and radically decimating environmental protection and stewardship in a matter of a couple years.

I am afraid for my country. Canada is the second largest land mass in the world – though our population is small, you can be sure that when a country that encompasses 7% of the world’s land mass, and has the largest coastline in the world says “screw it” to environmental protection, there will be massive global repercussions.

The Conservative leadership have admitted to shutting down environmental research groups on climate change because “they didn’t like the results” (http://tinyurl.com/7kpqk7d), are decimating the Species at Risk Act (our national equivalent of the IUCN Red list), are decimating habitat protection for fisheries, are getting rid of one of the most important water research facilities in the world (Experimental Lakes Area – has been operational since 1968, and allows for long-term ecosystem studies [http://tinyurl.com/cdygbdk] ), are getting rid of almost all scientists that study contaminants in the environment, have backed out of the Kyoto protocol – and the list goes on and on and on.

Entire divisions of scientific research are being eliminated. Our land, our animals, our plants, our environment are losing all the protection that has been building for decades – a contradictory stance to the rest of the world. (Please see their proposed omni-bill that basically tells the environment to go screw itself, while also being presented in an undemocratic fashion that limits debate on any of the 70+ changes [http://tinyurl.com/89ys2nf]).

David Schindler, a professor from the University of Alberta (and founder of ELA) quoted. “I think we have a government that considers science an inconvenience.”

I am writing this to implore every single person to please – look into this subject, and help us, help ourselves. Contact your MP, the Fisheries minister, Stephen Harper, anyone, everyone. I can’t sit by and just post rants on my Facebook page anymore. Share this letter, discuss, anything. Canada is an important nation environmentally, and our leadership doesn’t give a fig for science or the environment. But we do. This Conservative minority leadership was voted in on a thin string in the lowest voter election turnout in recent history, but thanks to our ridiculous voting laws, have 100% full power to do whatever they want. And in the name of short-term monetary oil profit, they have realized that progressive science and the environment are threats (obstacles) to their goals, and are doing so many things to eliminate both.

We are depressed, and frustrated, and mad, and need all the help we can get to protect the value of science and our environment. In the age of globalization, intentionally non-progressive leadership is going to affect everyone. We share our waters, air, and cycles with all of you. Science IS a candle in the dark, and we cannot let greed extinguish that flame. What happens in Canada – will happen everywhere.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

A Canadian that cares about science and the environment

**Update (May 22, 2012). There has been a huge overwhelming response to this letter. Over 40,000 people have viewed it, with hundreds of comments. There are a lot of different organizations that want to be part of a larger movement. There are also quite a few scientists who may want to speak out, but still cannot. I encourage anyone who wants to contribute and organize, and may desire to do it more discreetly (ie: anonymous and or/not as a public comment), to email me at
deciphering.science@gmail.com
. Please let your colleagues know as well. I will never publish your information unless you want me to, and will be organizing interested parties somehow, so that we can effect greater change – for ourselves, our freedom, and our beautiful planet.

**Update (May 25, 2012). An excellent opinion piece by a DFO scientist on the axing of the pollution programs at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/2012/opinion-mass-firing-of-canada2019s-ocean-scientists

Tyson Tells It As It Is, As Usual

Tyson Tells It As It Is, As Usual

Just a Sunday night thought :)

Water, Water Everywhere. But Not a Drop to Drink? (Part 1)

We need it, we like it, we are it. Water. It comprises over 70% of our bodies, and over 70% of the earth’s surface. H2O – two hydrogen atoms, one oxygen atom.

Hydrogen-Oxygen Bonding in Water

Chemical Structure of H2O

It is one of the most unique compounds in our known universe – the only one to have a solid that is lighter than its liquid form, it is the universal solvent, it is tasteless, odorless and invisible, etc.. It is both the environment life was likely born in, and the compound that all forms of life require to exist. It’s the refreshing liquid after exercise, the stunning architecture behind a snowflake, and the burning steam from the kettle. Every part of Earth and Earth’s history has been directly influenced and affected by this marvelous mystery of nature.

Well, where did water come from? No one actually knows. Our earth is 4.6 billion years old, and water appears in our earthly record at roughly 3.8 billion years ago, when the world was a fiery, chemical world with rocks just precipitating. The most common theory is that it formed from the gases released from the volcanoes that covered the world over. However, as water exists in many other places in the universe, as evidenced by meteors and other celestial bodies (Jupiter’s moon Celestia contains is covered by 160 km thick shell of frozen and liquid water – more than on all Earth!), so perhaps it arrived as a stowaway on the comets and asteroids that were constantly blasting the earth. While we can’t say for certain, we do know that the amount of water on earth has been the same throughout our geologic history. The best estimate is roughly 1.4 billion cubic kilometres of water, as projected by the Russian scientist Igor Shiklomanov. It’s not being created or destroyed, but just shifted around in varying compositions in a process known as the ‘hydrologic cycle’. The image below describes the beautiful cycle of water as it evaporates from oceans and plants, condenses in the air as clouds, falls back on earth, and is returned to the sea. There’s a myriad of offshoot processes, but that’s basically it. All rivers run to the sea, but all rivers are the sea, just at a further point in the cycle. And that’s the beauty of it. Our beautiful blue planet has this incredible system that desalinates, stores, and provides water in potable format to all living beings – free of charge.

Hydrologic Cycle

Hydrologic Cycle

Water is stored in many places: glaciers, lakes/rivers/streams, aquifers (natural underground storage chambers), permafrost, and the ground water (the water found deep underneath us in the earth, saturating the layers of rock). It’s all around us, abundant and plentiful. So what’s the problem? Why are many scientists projecting a bleak and scary future for water? If it’s the same amount, and always will be – que pasa?

The problem can be divided into three major issues: distribution, demand and pollution. I’ll discuss them in a 3 part series over the next week.

1) Distribution. Yes, there is water all over, and it is abundant and plentiful. But it is not distributed evenly across the planet. Some places (think Brazil, China, Russia, Canada) have more than enough water to meet local demands, even when they are outrageous. Other places (think the Sahara, southwestern USA, parts of Chile) are so dry they simply cannot meet local water demands. It’s not a simple case of uneven distribution either; even in water rich countries like China and Canada which have roughly the same amount of freshwater, we have to keep in mind China’s population has 1 billion more people than Canada. And in the case of the southwestern USA being heavily populated and demanding water, well that’s just not natural at all. They have basically irrigated a desert, and expect people to live there in the same hydrated comfort they do say, in the moist North Pacific.

So some places have a lot, and other places have little. The problem comes into play even moreso with water bodies that are shared by different nations, or worse – when the headwaters (where the water source is based) are in one country, and the outlet to the sea is in another. Think of the infamous, oft-ignored case of the Colorado River. For 6 million years, this powerful river poured forth from its birthplace in the Rocky Mountains, draining 2,250 kilometres south and west through deserts and canyons, lush wetlands, and into the Gulf of California in Mexico. In the 1920′s U.S. states began diverting water from it for irrigation, dams, and to support the booming populations of cities springing up in dry areas: Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Diego. In 1944, Mexico and the US came to an agreement about sharing multiple water bodies, including the Colorado, but since then the water quantity and quality (these waters are entering Mexico highly salinated after being irrigated in the US) has steadily declined – to the point that Mexican farmes are no longer able to grow their crops as before. Additionally, there’s even many inter-state conflicts in America itself over who gets how much water from the river. All the while, water levels all along the Colorado are sinking steadily, having severe ecological and anthropological health impacts. Even this superficial exploration of a single river demonstrates the complexity of distribution issues in regards to water. Who gets it? Who owns it? A consumption heavy nation with an incredibly large military and nonchalance for world resource consumption can certainly outweigh a smaller, poorer, less organized nation in water rights – but we all still need potable water to drink, sanitize, and grow food. Even when you have people like the Texas Commissioner Susan Combs who have made public outcries to just flat-out dam the Colorado and prevent any of the water from reaching Mexico over other water disputes, calling the natural flow of a river ‘giving’ Mexico water. Who’s going to monitor these situations for the greater good of the planet and the welfare of all?

**anecdote-based rant interjection** The Southwestern USA has to be one of the most wasteful regions of water I have ever been in. In high noon last year in June, I vividly recall dry, sandy cemeteries being watered by hoses pointed straight in the air, and ‘cooling’ water being sprayed outside of every shop – both evaporating almost instantly (not even mentioning Vegas and its pools and lawns). Yet they complain about droughts, and completely absorb all water that would naturally head for Mexico, depriving an entire region of their agriculture while wasting such a precious resource constantly and completely for…. nothing?

Now for the elephant in the room – global warming. Without entering the debate, IF global warming occurs at projected rates, then so will higher rates of evaporation. There will also be higher rates of melting in the snowcaps and glaciers, and we are already seeing this happen at both poles. We are also approaching a dangerous threshold where the icecaps may not be able to regenerate throughout the winter, and thus speed up the collapse of the polar ice caps.

Change in Ice Sheet Mass from the GRACE Satellite data

Change in Ice Sheet Mass, as generated by data from the GRACE satellite, found on http://www.skepticalscience.com

What does this mean in the context of water usage? More than 2/3 of the available freshwater on earth is frozen. As this ice melts, it goes directly into the ocean, making less and less of it available for usage. It also encourages higher temperature, and thus higher rates of evaporation – again, making less of it available for usage. Not just for us, but for all other forms of life too.

There’s a final compounded problem that is the direct result of urbanization. Everywhere humans go, we love ease of transport. This first translated into dirt roads, then gravel, now paved. Paved sidwalks, roads, parking lots, houses. Less grass, plants, trees, and other absorbing features of the earth. When the rain falls, instead of sating the earth, saturating the soil, and percolating downards to replenesh the ground water to come out potable elsewhere (a very important sustainable source of water), it now directly runs off the pavement and often directly into other water sources or the ocean, where it is lost into the system that takes a longer time to regenerate the same amount.

This problem leads us into the next part on demand. With a growing world population and growing demands on water, all the ecological issues that the previous populations have led us to are becoming magnified and compounded. So, feel free to leave comments, opinions, and discuss this topic, while I work steadily on the next one. And don’t forget to suscribe!

*Much of this information was taken from the excellent text “Water – The Fate of Our Most Precious Resource” by Marq de Villiers, as well as a host of other awesome internet resources.

The Bee’s Needs

Bees have been buzzing around our planet for almost 100 million years. That’s 999,800,000 years before we Homo sapiens showed up on the planetary bio-map. Related to wasps (yellow jackets, hornets, etc.), there are over 20,000 known species worldwide, and are entirely herbivorous, unlike their carnivorous cousins.

I’m sure we have all been lucky enough to spot a bee on a beautiful summer day, humming happily at any given flower (that is of course, if a fear of bees hasn’t been implanted in us, something I have observed and find rather tragic – fear of nature by her own children). I myself have spent quite some time trailing beautiful bumblebees across the dandelion-rimmed trails in the temperate forests Washington, stalking the bright orange Patagonian bee through the mountain ranges of the Andes – even tending to them in an organic acacia apiary (bee-farm) under the lip of the Alburni mountains in Southern Italy. Their constant dedication to their tasks at hand, the fascinating mathematical structures of the honeycomb, and of course, the dripping sweetness of fresh honey, has captivated my interest and admiration for humble bee.

Their presence across the world, and their importance as pollinators and providers of honey, has likewise attracted attention and praise throughout recorded history.

Ancient Egyptian Relief of a Bee Hieroglyphic

Ancient Egyptian Relief of a Bee Hieroglyphic

From dedicated Egyptian hieroglyphics to countless poems (think Aesop’s Fables, the Upanishads, Virgil, Shakespeare, E.O. Wilson, Emerson, Goethe, Thoreau, G.B. Shaw, Emily Dickinson, and many more), the complex nature and seemingly perfect social balance of bees has fascinated and inspired us for thousands of years. The bee was revered and played a central role in the mythologies and worship of the ancient Mayans, Greeks, Indians, Minoans, Celtics, and many more. Honey was the mystical ‘nectar of the gods’, and the bee seen as a goddess and creator of divine mathematical proportions. And not without just cause.

The bee is a majestic being. In simply preparing for this article, I ended up reading over 3 books and 20 articles – not because I needed to present that much information, but because their social structure and biological development is so utterly fascinating I was drawn into it completely. While we think of them as social creatures, in reality, less than 4% of all bees are actually social. The rest are solo fliers, digging nests in undisturbed areas of ground and trees. This small percentage however, contain some of the more commoner ones: sweat bees, carpenter bees, and the lovable bumblebee. It is this smaller percentage of the world’s bees that have drawn most scientific research and interest, as their social structure, so unlike ours, continues to inspire and draw the curiosity of all.

We’ve all heard of the “Queen Bee”. Almost 2000 years ago, Pliny the Elder was so amazed at the attention the worker and drone bees would lavish on this bee, that thought it must have been a male (A woman? In charge? No….), and referred to it as a King Bee. We know now that it is a female, and she has a majestic hold over the rest of the colony, though she is not the director; a grander collective good is what governs a bee colony, and remains not entirely understood. Prior to setting up her colony, she mates with up to 20 different males, and stores a lifetime supply of sperm in a special sac called a spermatheca. The male bees, called drones live lazy lives prior to this: begging for food from the female workers, living in dirty conditions, and generally performing no duties until mating time. At the mating time, the new queen meets a gathering of about 20 males, at their sexual prime at about 12 days of age. They have cleaned themselves, in preparation for coitus and present themselves for the queen. Many are unsuccessful in their attempts to mate at speeds up to 20 miles/hr in the air (!) and return to their cells, where they are eventually kicked out of the hive or murdered by all the female worker bees (they have been known to have been killed with the stinger of many of the females, as the soft flesh of the bee doesn’t hook and remove the stinger like it does in animal flesh). The successful ones have a short lived victory, as the queen bee flies off quickly after mating, ripping off the penis and viscera in her flight, and leaving the male tumbling to the ground in death.. The hive is obviously a very efficient factory – once your task is over, so is your welcome!

The old monarch, and a good subset of the bees from the colony (roughly 10,000) start house-hunting when the hive is over-crowded. The manner in which this happened was discovered by Martin Lindauer, a renowned scientist, who noticed that the bees had begun returning covered not in pollen, but in soot and dirt. When it’s finally too crowded to live comfortably, the scouting bees (roughly 5% of the hive, or a few hundred) will begin searching around for a new home – knotholes of trees, cracked windowsills, etc. Using an intricate step-measurement system, the bee will explore the space for up to half an hour, to determine if the house is suitable for the hive. She then returns to report her findings. Communicating with an incredibly detailed dance and vibration of her body, the bee reports the size and details of the potential location. If her dance is enthusiastic enough (firm selling pitch!), other scout bees will head out and investigate the location. This of course is incredible, as the bee manages to communicate the location and distance as well with this amazing dance – I’ll get more into this fascinating aspect in a bit. The fact-checkers return, and if in fact agree that it is a suitable location, begin performing the same dance. Ultimately, dancing scouts that aren’t attracting a lot of fact-checkers to their team drop off. The dance with the most dancers win, and the bees soar off as one to start a daughter hive in their new home.

This is in itself fascinating for many reasons, and after investigation and analysis, prompted Thomas Seeley, a biologist at Cornell, and his colleagues to create a set of rules from this social communication and interaction that could greatly benefit humans in their collective reality:

1. The decision making process is broadly diffused among ALL the scouts. Rather than having a small group of bees that make decisions for all the bees, all scouts have equal opportunity to discover a new home and convince the hive of it’s worthiness, thus being open to the broadest possible input of knowledge and ideas.
2. Each individual has her own opinion and doesn’t have to conform to the pushiest bee. All bees that return and report their findings have their opinions second checked by a non-biased bee. The non-biased bee does not have to agree if they find the home not suitable, and in fact this is how homes are selected, as the bee will return and NOT mimic the same dance if they disagree.
3. “The quorum-sensing method of aggregating the bees’ information allows diversity of opinion to thrive, but only long enough to ensure that a decision error is improbable.” This means that all opinions are considered and given equal weight, until all the bees come to a coalesced decision – not a compromise, but the best possible outcome as considered by all.

These 3 social rules mean that all bees can make the decision that will be chosen, all options are given equal weight and carefully considered, and the best possible outcome is chosen by all. If only Harper would take a clue!

Once the colony is set up, the worker bees immediately start preparing the famed and beautiful hexagonal honeycomb structure.

Honeycombs and Worker Bees

Worker Bees preparing Honeycombs

Cells are carefully prepared for the queen, with wax layers for her egg deposits. The queen roams the colony and will select and inspect a cell, using her forelegs to judge size. If it meets her requirements, she deposits an egg. These eggs vary in their diploid and fertilized status – the queen makes a decision of whether or not to fertilize the egg with the sperm she carries, and this determines the sex of the bee. If a male is chosen, the cells are noticeably larger, allowing them to grow into fat, reproductively-purposed larvae.

The food of the hive is provided by the foragers, and this is where we pull our lens of observation back and start to view a larger picture. The foragers leave the colony and begin searching for sources of nectar – flowers. Upon successfully collecting the pollen, they return with a full load to the entrance of the hive, where worker bees collect their harvest. In this exchange is another fascinating aspect of the bee communications – monitoring and control of food intake. If the colony is in need of food when the foragers arrive at the door, they are met eagerly and their harvest isimmediately unloaded. If the colony isn’t in need of much food at the moment, the foragers often have to wait at the door for up to a minute, buzzing around for a worker bee to take their load. If this begins to happen, their nervous system notes the anxiety and the bee begins agitatedly bumping into other returning bees, letting them know the harvest isn’t greatly needed. When their harvest is taken immediately, a nervous system ‘reset’ takes place and they know it’s alright to go back and collect. There is also an intricate dance that takes place at the door if a great source has been found. The bee will come back and begin excitedly wiggling. Through many years of careful observation, the Austrian biologist Karl Von Frisch (who won a Nobel Prize for his work with bees) discovered that the foragers actually denote direction exactly with their dance, and the frequency of their wiggles indicate the distance of the source! (Check out this incredible YouTube video). Other bees read the message and excitedly fly off to harvest from this more lucrative source. Bees have evolved a linguistic communication system that is incredibly precise, adaptive and flexible, based entirely on the motion of dance. This intricacy and evolution just blows my mind.

Macro Image from Nasa's Earth Observatory

Macro Bee Pollen Image - from Nasa

Over a hundred million years, flowers and bees have evolved a brilliant symbiosis. The bee forages at each flower, where pollen clings to the numerous hairs all over their body. When the bee moves on to the next flower, some of the pollen from the first flower is deposited, and so the bee acts as the go-between in the sexual mating of plants. This seemingly simple, yet incredibly glorious relationship between pollinator and pollinated is filled by several other animals, and has been a contributing factor in all the flowers you see (like the flowers you just received for Valentines Day!). While seemingly simple and small, the role of a pollinator is absolutely essential in a healthy ecosystem. Our global plant life depends on this act of feeding and sharing, and without protecting this fragility, the biological health of the planet is greatly endangered.

With increasing urbanization and mono-cropping of agricultural areas, the disappearance of our forests, meadows, grasslands, and biological life make the bees beautiful existence a fragile one. In addition to the loss of habitat Globalization is allowing bee pests and diseases to spread rapidly around the world, wiping out populations internationally. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) released a report calling the decline of populations a global phenomena – see here. The reports tells us that of over 100 crop species providing over 90% of the worlds food, 71 of them are bee-pollinated. Where will the food come from if bees die? I inwardly cringe at the idea of an all factory-produced diet, and hope anyone with half a sense of ‘you are what you eat’ does as well. “Well, that’s alright”, you think. “I eat mostly meat”. But what are those animals going to eat? Synthetic factory grains? The plight of the honeybee is a dangerous reality that we would do well not to ignore. In addition to their incredible structure that we could learn so much from, they literally provide us with most of our foods. Not to mention our gorgeous flowers.

So what can we do to save the bees? First and foremost is habitat conservation . This is important for so many other reasons beside just the bees. Don’t buy the oversized house in the suburbs, decrease your land imprint, and increase the natural, native plant life found on your property. Plant wildflowers around the margin of your property, giving bees more food and brightening up your property as well. Next, alternative agriculture. Again, important for many other reasons. Buy organic and local, and/or grow your own food. Lower purchases of pesticide heavy crops mean less growth (supply and demand), effectively lowering the input of dangerous pesticides and toxic chemicals into our environment. Corporations often spray at pollinating times of the year, killing off these precious and valuable bees as they do their work for a healthy planet. Every purchase of a trusted organic product saves a bee! (No math behind that one, just a concept :) ). Finally, buy honey from a good, trusted local farmer. Local bee farms (apiarys) are havens for many bees – places where the farmer does their best to ensure their health and reproduction in large numbers. Supporting these farmers gives them motivation to keep on taking care of their bees. Additionally, the health benefits of local honey are vast – especially if you suffer from seasonal allergies. Local honey often contains low doses of that which you are allergic to, contributing towards your general immunity. Not to mention – it is absolutely delicious. Heaven can be found in a teaspoon of fresh honey. Believe me.

So don’t be afraid of the bees. Show ‘em some love – they’ve evolved into incredible managers of our plants and food. If conservation efforts fail, the decline of the bees immediately impacts over 20,000 plant species. And each of those plant species will go on to affect huge networks of our interlinked living web – turning the world into a devastated place. They are an important, non-negotiable linkage in the ecosystem of our planet. As UNEP eloquently states, “Pollination is not just a free service but one that requires investment and stewardship to protect and sustain it.”

More info on bees, their goodness, their decline:

Bee Products and Love
NASA Special on Bees
Ontario Bee Info for Kids
Death of the Bees – GMO’s


Go to the bee,
then poet,
consider her ways
and be wise

-George Bernard Shaw

Notable Names: Richard Feynman

What defines genius? Real genius, not just the smart kid in the back of the class with all the answers. People like Galileo, Da Vinci, Einstein. The brilliant minds that take standard concepts, turn them upside down, and show us exactly why it never made such sense to us before. They take two dimensional images, and show us three dimensional truths.

Feynman, explaining something cool.

Or in the case of Richard Feynman, they take the most basic bits of the universe, and give us quantum electrodynamics. Feynman was a brilliant mathematician and physicist, and arguably one of the greatest science lecturers of all time. Let’s delve for a bit, via Feynman, into the wacky, weird world of energy: the stuff everything you have ever known or interacted with (including yourself, and this computer screen!) is composed of.

Now, I’m no physicist, but listening to Feynman’s lectures and interviews motivates me to learn more about the big majestic mystery of our physical universe. Born in 1918 in New York, Feynman was an intelligent student who had mastered differential and integral calculus by the time he was 15. He was turned away from Columbia University before being accepted at the famed MIT in Boston. After completing his bachelor’s, he then went on to Princeton, excelling constantly in physics, mathematics, and computational sciences. Indeed, his reputation for unprecedented thinking, clarifying lectures, and charming genius was so great that Albert Einstein himself attended his first graduate lecture. He was on his way to revolutionizing the field of physics, generating theories that are still being studied as our technology advances enough to measure it in laboratories. Feynman’s reputation even led him to the Manhattan Project, at the tender age of 24.

If you’re not into atomic or war history, the Manhattan Project was a secret project developed by the American government, that led to the creation of the first atomic bomb. The Manhattan Project operated from 1942-1946 in Los Alamos, New Mexico, and Feynman was a major contributor in the theoretical and computational division. Feynman has said that his idea of assisting on the project with the purpose of defending the US against Germany and Japan (who were supposed to be racing to develop the bomb first), should have dissipated when the threat did. He continued on with the work, stating that he was driven by solving the problem, not thinking deeply about the moral complications. He was also present at the Trinity Bomb test – the first atomic explosion, and the official inception of the Atomic Age. Shortly after, and despite the pleading of Robert Oppenheimer (head of the Los Alamos lab) to stay and continue contributing, Feynman took a post at Cornell briefly. He claimed he was uninspired by the atmosphere and close to burning out intellectually there, so he took a post at Cal Tech, where he ended up doing some of his best research. This includes:

  • a model of weak decay: The ‘weak’ interaction is one of the four fundamental forces of the universe, along with the strong nuclear, electromagnetic, and gravity. The interactions of these forces control all the little bits of our universe that cannot be broken down any further; the rules that regulate our most basic building blocks (that we know of). According to the Standard Theory, these are known as quarks, leptons, gauge bosons and higg boson (You may have heard about the Higgs-Boson, as it has been appearing quite frequently in the news. It is the only undiscovered particle of these, and scientists are quite close to finding it, thanks to the Large Hadron Collider’s incredible technology). While gravity is most commonly known force to us regular folks, the weak force controls quarks and leptons – known collectively as ‘fermions’ because they are the two particles of matter, not light. Weak force controls both radioactive decay, and hydrogen fusion – the force allowing the sun to shine, and all life to live. You may not think it’s that important, but without the weak force, there is no you, because there would be no universe, no sun, no energy to get that tan in the summer! A classic example of weak decay is when a neutron breaks down into a proton, electron, and anti-neutrino. Feynman ultimately developed a new and succinctly described model for this decay factor, incorporating ideas that had been lacking before.

  • physics of the superfluidity of supercooled liquid helium: Helium is the second most abundant particle in the observable universe, and its behaviour is amongst the strangest of all. It also has the unique property of having one of the lowest boiling and melting points: -269°C and -272°C respectively. In liquid form, helium had been observed to behave rather bizarrely when it was cooled slightly below the boiling point (Check out this excellent video for a visual representation). Feynman didn’t solve the whole problem, but applied the Schrödinger equation successfully to display the quantum mechanical behaviour on a macroscopic scale (I’ll try to briefly explain quantum mechanics in a moment).

  • quantum electrodynamics: This is the work Feynman is best known for, and for which he won a joint Nobel Prize in 1965. The quantum world itself is a section of physics that deals in the tiniest part of matter we know about – atoms. It’s a bizarre world that breaks down all the other rules that govern our everyday life. The five main ideas behind quantum theory are:

    A) Energy is not continuous, but moves in small, discreet bundles.
    B) Elementary particles move like matter AND waves (excellent video explaining this crazy phenomena here).
    C) This movement is intrinsically random.
    D) It is impossible to know the location and momentum of a particle at the same time – the more precisely one is known, the less precise the other measurement is.
    E) The quantum world is absolutely nothing like the one we live in.

    Feynman was one of the founding father of the Quantum Electrodynamic Theory. While complicated, it basically describes (through mathematics) all interactions of light with matter, and of charged particles (a subatomic particle or ion with an electric charge) with one another. It was important because it was the first theory to cohesively integrate Einstein’s special relativity theory into each equation, as well as satisfying the Schrödinger equation (a problem that Paul Dirac and Norman Wiener, two scientists that had developed the theory previously, were unable to solve).

    The three main concepts of Feynman’s QED theory is that: A) a photon goes from a location and time to another location and time, B) an electron goes from a location and time to another location and time, and C) an electron emits or absorbs a photon at a certain place and time. OK – what does that mean? To help explain these, Feynman came up with the self-named Feynman diagrams. Feynman Diagram Elements

    Feynman Diagram (simple).

    The first image shows us the symbols of parts A, B, or C of his theory. The second shows us an example of a Feynman Diagram – an ‘electron-positron annihilation’. Not to be mistaken for a Star Trek battle, this is when an negative electron (e−), and it’s opposite, a positive electron (positron [e+]) collide. This results in the annihilation of both, and photons are sent shooting out from the collision. Feynman’s theories and his well-known diagrams make ideas like this clearer, and more accessible visually to a large portion of the mathematically-disinclined population. Keep in mind, these diagrams are not set paths – just simplified suggestions representing potential quantum relationships symbolically.

    It’s important to note that QED theory doesn’t tell you what will happen, but predicts the probability of what will happen. In quantum mechanics, this means that you add up the sum of all possibilities, to any given endpoint, and predict the probability of the end result based on this total sum. We can loosely think of this as taking a random walk. You’ve had a bad day at work and want to clear your mind. Without knowing your final destination, you decide to cross the road to the other side, which happens to be infinite. Your brain is (hopefully!) measuring where potholes in the road you may have to avoid are, and the probability of whether or not you will get hit by a car. Your brain then tells you when to finally move, and on what path. Your exact footsteps are not predictable, nor is where or when you will step onto the sidewalk, but your brain has calculated the possibilities. And if you were a quantum particle participating in the theory, you would end up with a path and endpoint that were the sum of all possibilities. This computational method was referred to by Feynman as the path integral formulation , and stands in contrast to previous theories that predicted a single, unique trajectory. This formula helps us to understand (or at least diversify) our understanding of the movement of the very tiny little building blocks of our universe.

    Phew. If I have confused you, I’m sorry. I’m a bit confused myself at this point! Particles here, mathematics all over the chalkboard, what does that mean when I need to drag myself out of bed and go to work to feed the kids? The quantum world is difficult to grasp, and I would suspect that it’s still somewhat difficult even for the most brilliant of minds like Feynman. But that doesn’t mean its existence is irrelevant. It in fact informs everything about our lives, our composition, our beautiful planet tucked away here in this tiny corner of the universe. If our goal is to know ourselves, understanding the smallest bits is surely important, difficult as it may be. I’m sure this was one of Feynman’s motivating factors.

    While working on all of these ideas and more, Feynman also dedicated a large portion of his career to teaching. While still at Cal Tech, he was asked to get the undergraduates really involved and appreciative of physics. After several years of work, this resulted in the extremely accessible, beautiful, and inspiring Feynman’s Lectures on Physics which I highly recommend if you have the remotest interest in physics. Perhaps it will clear up any confusion I may have left you floundering in today!

    Now, I barely understand a percent of the incredible problems that Feynman naturally intuited, thought about deeply, and solved. However, the reason I appreciate him and his success as a physicist is due not only to his inherent genius, but also to his understanding of human nature. He was always open to new ideas and subjects, and constantly engaged his whole brain with love, academics, and artists – even creating some art himself under the pseudonym of ‘Ofey’. Watching his interviews and documentaries is always a pleasure, as he somehow manages to circumvent the common way of thinking, and present what have otherwise been very difficult concepts as clear and simple. Feynman has always managed to grasp the type of mind required to appreciate the universe – curious and humourous. As one of his colleagues best described, when you hear Feynman speak, you understand clearly the science behind physics. Once you leave the room however, you find yourself struggling to follow the same pathway that Feynman drew in your brain. I’d suspect it’s because few of us have ever taken that path before, and were so amazed by the beautiful things Feynman was showing us, that we forgot to remember the path. If we were to work hard enough though, we may be able to figure out the average probability to get back (A Feynman pun!).

    Richard Fenyman continued to revolutionize and bring physics to light (another pun!) for the rest of us. He worked on the Challenger disaster of ’86, and raised awareness of the huge discrepancies between the NASA management teams and their poorly informed understanding of physics. In his rather stark review, he says quite truthfully, “For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”

    Feynman died from several forms rare cancers at the age of 69, in Los Angeles. His last words, in true humourous form, “I’d hate to die twice. It’s so boring.”

    In memory of true genius, Richard P. Feynman 1918-1988.

    Genius

    What is necessary “for the very existence of science” and so forth, and what the characteristics of nature are, are not to be determined by pompous preconditions. They are determined always by the material with which we work, by nature herself. We look, and we see what we find, and we cannot say ahead of time -successfully- what it is going to look like.

    The most reasonable possibilities turn out often not to be the situation.

    What is necessary for the very existence of science is just the ability to experiment, the honesty in reporting results -the results must be reported without somebody saying what they’d like the results to have had been rather than what they are- and finally -an important thing-, the intelligence to interpret the results but an important point about this intelligence is that it should not be sure ahead of time what must be.

  • Earth Hour

    Earth Hour 2011

    Earth Hour

    The international movement of Earth Hour has been wildly successful, and while some may question its importance in terms of impact – it does have one! Hundreds of millions of people turn off their lights across the planet in a sweeping motion that reminds us to take a step back from all the technology, and the incredible amount of electricity we waste every day.

    And it’s unifying! Last year I spent Earth Hour at the Trevi Fountain in Rome. While it was a rather dismal turning off of the lights there, there was a huge gathering and a buzz in the air. The WWF tents were swamped, and all the tourists milling about were there for a different reason – unity! Standing together for something positive. Even though I barely spoke Italian, I could understand the excitement of joining together with other people for something besides self-indulgence. How can you not embrace the collective energy of hundreds of millions of people performing a positive act together? A couple years before that I was in a restaurant in Toronto, and had completely forgotten. The owner came around and asked everyone’s permissions to turn off the lights, and before you knew it, a standard dinner date had turned into an amazing and memorable candlelit evening!

    There are NO boundaries in Earth Hour – no country lines, no religious boundaries, no political divisions. We all stand together for a sweeping hour in the name of OUR planet. The one we all share. The one we all have a duty to protect from our own damaging practices.

    So try it out. Join thousands of cities, and hundreds of millions of people and today (March 26th) at 8:30 PM , turn off your lights for an hour (or more!) Have a romantic candlelit dinner. Walk out to a park and look at the brilliant array of stars. Play Scrabble on the living room floor with your children and candles. Just lay down and feel the lack of constant electrical buzzing. Go to a famous landmark! Sign up at (www.earthhour.org) and commit to stand together with so many people. Spread the word to your family and friends!

    And then beyond that. Try making sure all the lights are off when you leave the house. Turn the lights off when you leave a room. Turn your computers off at night. Have everything plugged into a power surge bar, and just turn that off when you leave. So much electricity is wasted daily by appliances left plugged in (up to 10%), and that takes both time, money, and resources to power. You’ll save money and reduce your environmental footprint. Let’s start to think for ourselves: for our big, beautiful planet that we all share.

    It’s not too late. And every act counts. And together – we can make a difference.

    www.earthhour.org

    « Older entries

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 107 other followers